1 | DAILY DOSE OF 32-0 | THE RAFFY TULFO IN ACTION VS. ATTY. LIBAYAN COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT CASE
00:44.5
Sa civil case, mga kabatas natin, once a civil case is dismissed, it is appealable.
00:52.2
Okay? Pwede mong i-appeal yan.
00:54.4
Ibig sabihin, pag na-appeal ang...
00:56.6
Ang isang kaso, mga kabatas natin, it does not become final and executory.
01:04.3
In relation to a criminal case, mga kabatas natin, once a criminal case is dismissed, okay, that's it, pansit.
01:15.7
It is not subject to appeal because if you appeal the case, it is considered double jeopardy.
01:24.2
Ibig sabihin, mga kabatas natin, because this case...
01:26.6
If the cases were dismissed, okay, it's already terminated.
01:31.9
Ngayon, mga kabatas natin, binanggit ko sa inyo, yung petition for review on certiorari based on Rule 65.
01:40.5
Sinasabi kasi nila, hindi, hindi pa tapos yan.
01:43.0
Meron pang petition for review on certiorari based on Rule 65.
01:46.6
That is a different case.
01:50.9
Because Rule 65, mga kabatas natin, is a petition.
01:57.7
It is a petition and the parties there will be different.
02:03.2
Anong ibig sabihin ko doon?
02:04.7
Kasi nga, you will file a case.
02:09.1
A petition for review on certiorari based on Rule 65.
02:13.3
If there is grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction in relation to any instrumentality,
02:26.3
of the government.
02:28.6
Anong mangyayari dyan ngayon, mga kabatas natin?
02:30.7
If you file a petition for review on certiorari, mga kabatas natin, magiging party to the case yung judge.
02:38.9
Actually, mga kabatas natin, ang ina-assail mo doon ay yung judge.
02:44.6
And it is no longer this case.
02:54.7
A petition for review on certiorari.
02:56.3
If certiorari is a different case, this also are different cases.
03:05.8
So, separate case.
03:07.2
Yes, because in the petition for review on certiorari, you will assail or you will allege grave abuse of discretion
03:17.0
amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction in relation to how the judge decided on the case.
03:28.1
Kaya pag nakikita nyo, mga kabatas natin, doon sa mga criminal cases kung saan may petition for review on certiorari, mga kabatas natin,
03:36.2
versus judge something, something, something.
03:49.4
Ngayon, let's go to the number of cases or counts.
03:55.0
This is how it works.
03:56.2
This is how it works.
03:56.3
This is, mga kabatas natin, ha.
03:59.6
Ditong kasong ito, itong kasong ito, this is a very good example, no?
04:03.7
People of the Philippines versus Attorney Ronnie Randolph-Levine for copyright infringement.
04:08.3
Criminal cases, numbers 789, 7898 to 7929, TG.
04:18.5
Ibig sabihin, mga kabatas natin, these are 32 cases.
04:24.8
32 cases ito na kinonsolidate.
04:32.3
The same with the other two cases.
04:34.7
Dalawang kaso lang dapat yun.
04:36.6
They can be tried separately, but they were consolidated.
04:40.9
Because it involves the same parties, and pwede namang litisin siya ng sabay-sabay.
04:47.9
So this one, mga kabatas natin, every criminal case,
04:54.2
not only criminal case, every civil case, mga kabatas natin,
04:59.1
there are as many cases as there are case numbers.
05:08.3
So ito, mga kabatas natin, 7898 to 7929, these are 32 cases.
05:17.8
Now let's talk about probable cause.
05:21.2
Yung probable cause na pinag-uusapan dito,
05:24.2
mga kabatas natin, nung kabilang kubol,
05:27.8
we are way past that.
05:29.7
Yung probable cause kasi na sinasabi nila, doon sa prosecutor yun.
05:35.7
Yung probable cause na dinideside doon sa prosecutor,
05:41.3
yun, mga kabatas natin, yung nagsasabi kung pwede nga na may nangyaring krimen,
05:49.4
at pwede nga na ako yung gumawa ng krimen,
05:54.2
ipa-file yung information,
05:55.9
mawawala na sa prosecution yung jurisdiction,
05:58.8
pupunta na sa korte.
06:00.3
Ito, pumunta na sa korte.
06:07.6
Sabi ni Kayo, legit yan na separate cases kasi you can win 5 and lose 27 gets.
06:14.1
Kasi dito sa 32 counts na ito, tama yung sinabi mo.
06:17.7
So, pwedeng makahanap ng guilt beyond reasonable doubt sa lima,
06:24.2
tapos ma-acquit ako sa 27.
06:30.1
Kinonsolidate lang o kaya pinagsama-sama lang para sa speedy disposition of cases
06:35.6
and of course, speedy trial.
06:38.7
For us to save the time and resources of the court.
06:43.9
Pero attorney, bakit hindi nila binilang yung mga nalaglag sa original claims nila prior sa probable cause?
06:50.1
Because, okay, they are already raffled to another day.
06:58.2
And these cases were also raffled to a different judge.
07:04.0
Remember, anong nangyari?
07:06.1
Nag-file sila ng motion for consolidation,
07:09.3
kung saan iko-consolidate itong 32 counts na ito doon sa 2 counts.
07:18.4
But it was denied by the judge doon sa naghahandle ng 32.
07:26.8
Gano'n na nangyari doon.
07:29.4
Kaya ito, mga kabatas natin, they remained doon sa judge na na-iraffle ito.
07:39.7
Kung may tanong kayo, tanongin nyo lang yan, mga kabatas natin.
07:42.4
So we can, we can clearly, ano, no?
07:50.7
Ngayon, mga kabatas natin, let's go to the petition for review on surgery.
07:54.2
Yung petition for review on surgery based on Rule 65.
07:57.4
Yung petition for review on surgery based on Rule 65, mga kabatas natin,
08:02.5
like I said, that's a different case.
08:04.9
And, okay, sino ang makakapag-file noon?
08:09.6
Ang makakapag-file noon ay yung Office of the Solicitor General.
08:17.3
It should be always with the conformity of the Office of the Solicitor General.
08:24.2
Under the National Prosecution Service.
08:28.6
Ang National Prosecution Service, mga kabatas natin, yung mga prosecutors natin,
08:32.2
doon sila humahawak sa lower-level courts.
08:37.2
Pag aakyat na yan, mga kabatas natin, CA at saka Supreme Court Office of the Solicitor General.
08:45.3
Ang tanong, alam nyo naman na lahat, divinal na yung abogado ni ano,
08:49.7
o kaya si Rafi Tulfo, yung Rafi Tulfo yung action.
08:54.2
File a petition for review on certiorari?
08:57.8
Because of the fact that criminal cases are pursued in the interest of the state,
09:07.2
and the state is the principal component,
09:10.9
and the private complainants are merely reduced into witnesses.
09:17.8
Hindi sila pwede.
09:21.2
Hindi pwedeng yung private complainant lang.
09:24.2
Meron yung Office of the Solicitor General.
09:27.3
Ngayon, mga kabatas natin, tanong ulit.
09:30.7
Sandali, attorney.
09:32.5
Di ba, sinabi mo rin na kapag yung mga criminal cases na yan,
09:36.7
ang interest talaga ng private lawyers dyan ay yung civil aspect of the case.
09:41.7
But can they appeal that?
09:43.0
Of course, they can appeal the civil aspect of the case.
09:45.2
If they will only appeal the civil aspect of the case.
09:47.7
The problem here is, mga kabatas natin,
09:51.6
they did not ask for,
09:54.2
any civil liability.
09:56.2
Pag civil liability, ang usapan, pera.
10:00.8
If, whenever you say civil liability, pera yan.
10:04.5
How can Rafi Tulfo in action ask naman daw for civil liability or pera,
10:10.6
kung they are a foundation?
10:13.2
If you are a foundation, of course, you're not in it for the money.
10:24.2
nasagot ko na lahat yun.
10:26.2
Let's go to the omnibus resolution.
10:29.3
Mga kabatas natin,
10:30.6
this is a work of art as well as the omnibus resolution din
10:34.7
na denial ng motion for reconsideration.
10:42.5
Yun yung titignan natin.
10:44.7
Ngayon, mga kabatas natin,
11:07.4
Si Pilate agad, mga kabatas natin.
11:19.0
Indeed, what is truth in the clash of civilizations?
11:24.2
Grabe yung mga basis, no?
11:31.6
Indeed, what is truth when the scientific theory of relativity by Albert Einstein
11:38.0
had been co-opted by the political, socio-economic, psychological spheres
11:43.5
such that the individual reigns supreme over all cultures?
11:49.1
What is truth when everything is relative?
11:52.1
Is there any more truth in law?
11:56.7
Can justice be anywhere in the system when truth is hidden by the powers that be?
12:07.9
The search for truth herein stems from filing of criminal cases number 7153 and 7154TG
12:16.4
under the following allegations.
12:18.8
Ito yung original na dalawang kaso.
12:23.2
Mga kabatas natin.
12:28.5
Remember, this is the decision that is 123 pages.
12:33.1
Kaya lang, marami kasing information nito.
12:38.0
Ito, mga kabatas natin.
12:41.1
Yung unang information nila,
12:44.0
lahat ng mga kaso, sinalig.
12:47.3
Yan, yan, yan, yan.
12:50.3
Sinali lahat, mga kabatas natin, kontra rito lo.
12:56.1
Tapos, anong nangyari dyan?
13:00.2
Assisting Judge Jamie B. Santiago
13:02.3
required the amendment of the cases within five days
13:06.0
to state with particularity
13:08.0
the chapter of Section Part 4, Republic Act 8293
13:12.3
violated and to provide evidence within said period
13:17.2
on why the acts of the accused may not be considered.
13:20.3
as within protected rights
13:22.2
under Chapter 15, Section 212 to 214.4,
13:27.8
Part 4 of Republic Act 8293
13:29.9
on pain of dismissal.
13:32.3
Mga kabatas natin, ganito kasi yung nangyari.
13:35.0
Nung umpisa, mga kabatas natin,
13:36.6
ang unang humawak si Judge Jamie B. Santiago.
13:40.2
Yung dalawang kaso ni Judge Jamie B. Santiago,
13:42.8
yung dalawang kaso, yung unang-unang copyright infringement
13:46.3
at naraffle kay Judge Jamie B. Santiago,
13:50.1
mga kabatas natin,
13:52.5
ito yung ginawa niya.
13:54.3
And it was dismissed by Judge Jamie B. Santiago.
13:57.1
Then, after that,
13:59.0
si Judge Jamie B. Santiago, mga kabatas natin,
14:02.7
na early retirement,
14:05.0
pagkatapos niya, nalipat sa ibang judge,
14:07.1
then it was reinstated by the former judge.
14:10.5
Or former judge, the subsequent judge.
14:14.1
Ngayon, mga kabatas natin, let's not, ano,
14:16.7
let's not dwell on that muna.
14:18.7
Pero these are the facts, no?
14:20.1
That will not be affecting the other cases.
14:22.1
Assisting Judge Jamie B. Santiago dismissed the cases
14:25.3
on the ground that copyright infringement is misplaced
14:28.0
since the accused did not pass the videos of Rafi Tulfo in action
14:31.3
as his own works.
14:32.9
So, dinismiss yung unang dalawa.
14:35.0
Ngayon, mga kabatas natin,
14:37.2
nagkaroon ng ganito.
14:38.2
On 7 December 2023,
14:40.0
Assisting Judge Maria Paz Arreyes-Izon
14:42.7
partially granted the motion for reconsideration
14:44.8
on the dismissal order
14:45.8
on the ground that fair use of a copyrighted work
14:48.1
is a matter of defense
14:49.2
and must be subjected to a trial.
14:50.1
A full-blown trial.
14:52.4
Ito yung sinasabi ko sa inyo, mga kabatas natin.
14:54.1
The said court had allowed the amendment of the information
14:56.6
per Section 110, Rule 110, Section 14
15:00.8
of the Rules of Criminal Procedure.
15:03.5
Kasi hindi pa daw ako na-arrange.
15:06.8
Yun nangyari dyan,
15:08.1
by reason of said 7 December 2023 order
15:14.5
and the observations of both judges
15:16.4
in their respective orders,
15:17.8
the assistant city prosecutor, Rene,
15:20.1
ito, recommended the filing of 32 informations.
15:23.6
So, nandyan na yung 32 informations.
15:26.3
Ito yung 32 informations, mga kabatas natin.
15:29.7
Ito yung mga na-dismiss.
15:34.2
Boom, boom, boom, boom, boom.
15:36.5
Boom, boom, boom, boom, boom.
15:40.2
Yan, puro information yan, mga kabatas natin.
15:45.3
Yan, yan, yan, yan, yan, yan.
15:47.2
Yan, yan, yan, yan.
15:52.4
And it's also scary.
15:54.1
Imagine, pagpumasok tong mga kasong to,
15:56.3
mga kabatas natin,
16:03.6
almost 700,000 pesos.
16:10.1
abot ng mga 700,000 pesos,
16:12.6
mga kabatas natin,
16:13.8
yung magiging bail ko.
16:16.3
Doon sa pinag ng prosecutor
16:24.5
Ito, dismissed, dismissed.
16:25.9
Ito yung mga kasong dismissed.
16:28.8
So, linabas yan, mga kabatas natin,
16:41.2
Ngayon, mga kabatas natin,
16:46.0
each information,
16:47.2
blah, blah, blah, blah,
16:48.8
pinagkakonsolidate yung case,
16:51.4
mga kabatas natin,
17:01.2
reiterations lang
17:02.1
ng mga nandun sa task.
17:05.0
on 22 February 2024,
17:07.4
Atty. Randolph Bilibayan
17:08.9
filed the motions
17:09.7
for judicial determination
17:10.7
of probable cause
17:11.4
in all the cases herein
17:13.0
upon the following grounds,
17:14.9
that the additional
17:18.4
from the preliminary investigation
17:22.4
resolution of the prosecutor,
17:24.4
that the said cases
17:25.3
were not part of the records
17:26.6
contrary to the claim
17:27.4
of the prosecutor
17:28.1
in its 15 February 2024 order,
17:33.5
of the 32 information
17:35.6
of the private complainant
17:36.6
subject of the preliminary investigation
17:37.8
were not even close
17:38.7
to such a number,
17:39.8
blah, blah, blah, blah,
17:41.1
May 5, 2023 resolution
17:43.8
found probable cause
17:44.6
for only two counts,
17:48.4
who authenticated
17:50.2
the sworn affidavit
17:51.1
in relation to the allegations
17:52.4
in the new informations,
17:54.2
blah, blah, blah, blah,
17:55.9
was not furnished
17:56.7
a copy of the said
17:58.7
blah, blah, blah, blah,
17:59.7
ito yung sinabi ko,
18:04.7
blah, blah, blah, blah,
18:10.6
sumagot naman yung
18:13.0
Rafi Tool for Inaction
18:15.1
the accused motion
18:15.9
for judicial determination
18:16.9
of probable cause
18:18.4
and should be denied
18:19.6
outright for being
18:20.3
prohibited pleadings,
18:22.2
blah, blah, blah, blah,
18:23.3
the court should determine
18:24.4
the existence of probable cause
18:26.2
from filing of the information
18:27.5
to either dismiss the case
18:28.6
or issue warrant of arrest.
18:34.4
since the additional
18:36.3
charge exactly the same crime
18:38.2
as the initial two informations
18:39.5
are based on the same
18:40.4
Office of the City Prosecutor
18:42.5
and the same supporting
18:45.9
by previous judges
18:50.2
blah, blah, blah, blah.
18:54.2
allegations nila.
18:56.6
ang maganda kasi dito,
19:02.7
mga kabadis natin,
19:04.3
yung korte na yung
19:06.5
Doon sa task kami kasi,
19:07.9
ito na yung korte.
19:11.0
mga kabadis natin,
19:11.8
there is a confusion
19:13.4
on whether or not
19:15.3
the court should comply
19:19.3
of Criminal Procedure.
19:20.8
The accused claimed
19:24.3
for judicial determination
19:25.5
of probable cause.
19:26.8
The prosecution claimed
19:27.8
that there is no need
19:28.7
for the court to do so
19:29.6
as the previous judges
19:31.6
so in the previous
19:37.1
the initial two cases
19:38.2
of criminal cases
19:43.3
Neither is correct.
19:46.2
mga kabadis natin,
19:51.0
ang gagawin dapat dito,
19:54.1
ang suggestion ko sa korte,
19:57.5
dapat magkaroon ng
20:00.3
judicial determination
20:02.0
of probable cause,
20:07.6
mga kabadis natin,
20:10.8
motion for determination
20:11.8
of probable cause,
20:26.5
mga kabadis natin,
20:32.1
Ito ay sinabi niya,
20:33.5
neither is correct,
20:35.5
So, ibig sabihin,
20:37.6
tapos yung kalaban ko,
20:40.9
Rafi Tulfo in action,
20:43.8
alam nyo naman yun,
20:44.8
represented by the divina,
20:51.5
sinayit niya itong mga ito,
20:52.9
Rule 1.1 to Section 6
20:54.1
of the Rules of Criminal Procedure.
20:57.0
when accused lawfully arrested
20:58.3
without a warrant,
20:59.4
when a person is lawfully arrested
21:01.2
without a warrant
21:02.0
involving an offense
21:04.1
a preliminary investigation,
21:05.6
the complaint or information
21:06.9
may be filed by a prosecutor
21:08.9
of such investigation
21:09.9
provided an inquest
21:11.3
has been conducted
21:12.9
with existing rules.
21:15.3
or unavailability
21:16.4
of an inquest prosecutor,
21:20.0
the complaint, sorry,
21:21.5
by the offended party
21:22.6
or a peace officer
21:25.0
hindi naman masyado ito.
21:26.4
Warrantless arrest lang.
21:30.2
before the complaint
21:31.3
or information is filed,
21:32.5
the person arrested
21:33.3
may ask for a preliminary investigation
21:35.3
in accordance with this rule,
21:37.1
but he must sign a waiver,
21:39.9
of the provisions
21:41.6
of the Revised Penal Code
21:45.9
Notwithstanding the waiver,
21:47.1
he may apply for bail
21:48.9
and the investigation
21:50.1
must be terminated
21:51.9
from its inception.
21:53.7
Ngayon, mga kabatas natin,
21:56.1
or information in court
21:57.1
without a preliminary investigation,
22:00.4
from the time he learns
22:02.2
ask for a preliminary investigation
22:03.7
with the same right
22:04.7
to adduce evidence
22:06.5
as provided in the rule.
22:08.2
So, ito mga kabatas natin,
22:09.4
arrest without awaran,
22:10.5
tapos yung filing,
22:11.2
this is prosecutor's level.
22:15.9
sinabi niya mga kabatas natin,
22:17.1
such is not applicable
22:20.4
The accused had not been arrested
22:22.4
herein lawfully or not.
22:25.8
So, hindi pa ako na-aresto,
22:36.4
Section 5 of the Rules
22:37.4
of Criminal Procedure
22:38.4
which is applicable.
22:42.4
when warrant of arrest
22:44.6
by the regional trial court
22:52.1
personally evaluate
22:54.0
of the prosecutor
22:54.9
and its supporting evidence.
22:57.6
He may immediately
22:60.0
if the evidence on record
23:05.6
to establish probable cause.
23:07.8
If he finds probable cause,
23:10.4
a warrant of arrest
23:11.5
or a commitment order
23:13.7
has already been arrested
23:15.0
pursuant to a warrant
23:16.3
issued by the court.
23:18.3
the preliminary investigation.
23:20.6
Or when the complaint
23:21.6
or information was filed
23:22.9
pursuant to Section 7
23:26.6
of probable cause,
23:27.9
the judge may order
23:29.5
to present additional evidence
23:33.2
So, itong sinasabi niya dito
23:34.5
mga kapwes natin,
23:36.1
yung former judge,
23:37.5
si Judge Santiago,
23:38.6
ito yung ginawa niya.
23:42.5
ng additional evidence.
23:44.4
Yun yung ginawa sa kanila.
23:46.0
and the issue must be resolved,
23:47.0
solved by the court
23:52.3
mga kapwes natin.
23:57.4
judicial determination
23:58.4
of probable cause
24:00.4
of a warrant of arrest
24:01.6
in the information
24:03.8
This is mandatory
24:04.6
on the part of the court.
24:06.2
Yun yung hiningi ko.
24:08.1
mga kapwes natin,
24:12.4
It is superfluous.
24:14.6
It is really superfluous.
24:24.0
It's merely strategy.
24:26.8
It's just strategy.
24:29.3
this is the reason
24:32.3
for determination
24:33.0
of probable cause
24:33.8
is deemed superfluous
24:35.1
by the revised guidelines
24:36.2
for continuous trial
24:37.4
of criminal cases.
24:41.6
automatic na dapat
24:46.8
superfluous siya.
24:49.4
judicial determination
24:50.6
of probable cause,
24:52.7
dahil hindi mo na
24:54.0
kailangang mag-file
24:59.3
the court should not wait
25:01.2
for judicial determination
25:02.5
of probable cause
25:04.1
in order to determine
25:07.9
of a warrant of arrest
25:15.5
the court's obligation
25:19.3
exhorts the court
25:26.7
So, that is the reason
25:28.5
it's superfluous.
25:30.8
a prohibited pleading?
25:33.5
you're not supposed
25:34.3
to do it anymore.
25:37.7
mga kabatas natin,
25:42.4
for obvious reasons.
25:44.8
For obvious reasons.
25:49.6
I want to be sure.
25:53.9
I want to be sure.
25:58.1
I know they know it.
26:07.5
of lawyers din kasi.
26:10.5
Yung mga gantong klase.
26:14.1
because, of course,
26:18.6
to tell the court.
26:23.1
lawyers understand,
26:29.8
It's part of strategy,
26:32.5
It must be remembered
26:33.7
that criminal cases
26:38.9
against the accused
26:40.8
concerned information
26:42.0
alleging the enumeration
26:43.4
of all the reviewed
26:44.7
videos of the accused.
26:46.8
which are the subject
26:48.9
On the assumption
26:49.5
of single motive,
26:52.3
Judge Jamie B. Santiago
26:55.3
but required the prosecution
26:56.7
to provide evidence
26:57.9
otherwise thereto
26:59.6
that there should be
27:09.8
Yung unang judge,
27:11.3
early retirement,
27:13.4
si Judge Jamie Santiago,
27:15.1
dinismiss na yung dalawa
27:19.7
Hindi naman in-amend
27:23.3
Judge Jamie B. Santiago,
27:27.4
Judge Jamie B. Santiago
27:28.4
dismissed the two cases
27:29.6
on the finding of fair use
27:31.1
since the accused
27:31.8
was making commentaries
27:36.6
for reconsideration
27:38.2
Judge Maria Paz Reyes
27:41.2
Judge Jamie B. Santiago
27:45.1
Judge Maria Paz Reyes
27:46.8
granted partially
27:48.2
for reconsideration
27:52.1
in criminal cases
27:56.6
So, yun yung nangyari
27:57.4
doon, mga kapos natin.
27:58.6
So, it was reinstated.
28:01.8
were the deletion
28:02.8
of the other videos
28:05.2
initial information.
28:06.9
dyan, mga kapos natin,
28:10.5
pending pa na kaso
28:14.8
That's a different case.
28:16.8
Different case number,
28:19.8
That's a different case,
28:23.5
about the 32 cases.
28:27.3
copyright infringement
28:33.6
Ngayon, sabi niya,
28:39.9
applying section 5
28:42.7
of criminal procedure
28:45.4
filed before her?
28:51.8
initial informations
28:54.6
to be dismissible
29:00.8
to be the subjects
29:04.9
Kasi mga kapatid natin,
29:13.0
mga kapatid natin,
29:26.3
were not the amended
29:28.2
There are entirely
29:30.0
filed before this court.
29:32.6
determine personally
29:33.6
the probable cause
29:39.7
of criminal procedure
29:44.4
of probable cause.
29:48.2
Any tanong so far?
29:56.1
Any tanong so far?
30:04.6
Ano ba yung tanong dyan
30:09.8
pakitanong kay Atty. Leaves.
30:11.0
Pwede sila kasuhan
30:12.7
sa mga malilit na channel.
30:14.5
Makapang-abala lang.
30:15.6
At chilling effect
30:17.8
taong gusto pa niya
30:21.4
maling ginagawa niya.
30:26.3
Reserve muna natin yan.
30:30.5
pang-panggulat natin.
30:32.3
Panggulat na lang
30:36.5
Panggulat na lang
30:42.9
Lipat tayo sa kabila
30:43.8
mga kabatas natin.
30:45.6
Tutuloy natin dito.
30:47.3
Lipat tayo doon sa
30:55.8
Maraming salamat pa
30:56.9
mga kabatas natin.
30:58.2
tulad na lang yung sinabi.
31:01.4
na yung natutulog
31:03.5
sa yung laging panalo.
31:06.2
Papunta pa lang tayo
31:07.1
sa exciting part.
