3 | DAILY DOSE OF 32-0 | THE RAFFY TULFO IN ACTION VS. ATTY. LIBAYAN COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT CASE
01:05.1
Okay? Maraming salamat ho dun sa mga nagko-comment at nagsasending message na parang,
01:10.2
okay, this changed my perspective in relation to our justice system.
01:14.3
Kasi nga, mga kabatas natin, this is a David and Goliath fight in all aspects.
01:24.5
This case is against, or this case was filed by Rafi Tulfo in action
01:30.3
and Rafi Tulfo in action is controlled by Rafi Tulfo and the Tulfo family.
01:35.5
They have the best lawyers in the Philippines.
01:42.0
They filed 32 cases.
01:43.7
This is just the 32 cases, mga kabatas natin.
01:49.4
Let's talk about the other cases when I have them dismissed.
01:53.3
32 cases, mga kabatas natin.
01:59.1
Tulungan na sinabi ko sa inyo, kapag kunwari pumasok ito,
02:04.7
na-issuehan ako ng warrant of arrest dito,
02:09.6
tapos magbe-bail ako dito, mga kabatas natin,
02:13.2
almost 700,000 pesos.
02:15.8
Bail pa lang yun.
02:17.9
And I also told you na it's quite a blessing.
02:23.3
That I was the one who was accused of this harassment suit, mga kabatas natin.
02:36.7
Because I am a lawyer.
02:38.9
I can defend myself.
02:42.3
And mga kabatas natin, isipin nyo na lang kung ibang tao yung nakasuhan dyan.
02:47.3
You will be defending 32 cases.
02:49.8
32 cases means 32 exceptions.
03:02.0
Ngayon, mga kabatas natin, let's talk about due process.
03:07.6
Ito yung sinabi kasi ng judge dito.
03:11.1
There is a problem of due process here.
03:14.2
Alam nyo naman, itong si Rafi Tulfo kasi, mga kabatas natin,
03:16.6
at ang Rafi Tulfo in action,
03:18.3
they are proud doon sa kanilang cut the process at Tulfo brand of justice.
03:23.3
Which I told you is asyam.
03:25.9
Fake justice yun.
03:29.6
Sabi niya, it is ironic because it has been the consistent theme,
03:33.6
theme of the videos of the accused herein.
03:37.7
Isipin nyo mga kabatas natin, as a lawyer,
03:40.3
and a person who fights for due process.
03:44.3
Tapos, ako pa yung mamaliin.
03:48.7
Sabi niya, there is a long-running joust with the instant justice of the private justice.
03:53.4
Complainant, Rafi Tulfo in action,
03:55.5
and the due process insistence of the accused.
04:00.4
Pero ano sabi nila kasi?
04:03.1
Sabi nung mga promo-protekta sa Rafi Tulfo in action,
04:08.7
tsaka kay Rafi Tulfo,
04:10.2
hindi daw kailangan ni Rafi Tulfo mag-observe ng due process.
04:15.5
So, vigilantism na lang, ganon.
04:17.8
Vigilante justice.
04:19.6
So, hindi kailangan mag-observe ng due process
04:21.5
o pumunta doon sa mga lugar na may...
04:26.8
Tabingin tayo doon.
04:28.7
That's not correct.
04:32.6
Ganon, sabi ni Kayo,
04:33.8
it only means that more lawyers should stand up and take the lead to fight injustice.
04:38.8
I hope they will do it.
04:43.5
Kasi, mga kabatas natin,
04:46.7
this fight is difficult.
04:49.6
Everybody knows that.
04:50.5
Imagine the cases that are being filed against me.
04:53.3
Imagine how they ridicule me,
04:56.3
yung mga ampalaya.
04:58.0
How they demean my job.
05:00.2
How they demean my family.
05:03.8
Paano nila siraan lahat na lang
05:10.1
Paano nila kasuhan,
05:13.8
pati pa yung mga small vloggers?
05:17.9
This is more than David and Goliath, I guess.
05:29.3
But look what happened.
05:31.6
And this is just the beginning.
05:36.3
2024, I believe, will be a year.
05:39.9
A lot of things will happen
05:41.9
that is in favor of justice and due process.
05:53.5
because the person who wanted instant justice
05:56.7
asked for it and got it at the level of the prosecutor's office.
06:12.7
Boom! You got it!
06:16.5
It is also ironic because it has been the accused
06:19.7
who had constantly defended the office of the public prosecutor,
06:24.3
the public attorney's office,
06:26.1
the court and court personals,
06:28.7
and the Supreme Court in the videos against
06:43.7
My citation, number four,
06:46.5
annexed H-I-J-J-N-I-I.
06:48.7
Yun yung mga pagkakataon, mga kabatas natin,
06:51.4
that I am defending my colleagues
06:53.2
and the offices where my colleagues work.
07:03.7
Now, clearly, the evidence presented by both parties
07:07.8
demands the implementation of the fair use measure
07:11.2
in determination of the copyright infringement
07:13.9
of the accused herein.
07:18.7
185 of Republic Act 8293
07:21.6
or the Intellectual Property Code
07:26.3
Alam niyo mga kabatas natin, like I said,
07:27.9
we have to learn this
07:29.8
because every one of us
07:32.5
is in social media.
07:35.6
Kahit anak ko, mga kabatas natin,
07:39.5
nasa social media.
07:45.3
Sabi ni Ms. Rosani,
07:46.9
very evident sa mga videos,
07:48.2
how Attorney Libayon is protecting
07:49.7
and defending the justice system.
07:54.1
Like I said, that's my job as a lawyer.
07:58.2
Binabaliktad lang nung kabila.
08:03.3
Dahil may backer kayo.
08:09.4
Let's go to fair use.
08:12.8
of a copyrighted work.
08:15.4
The fair use of a copyrighted work for criticism,
08:23.5
yung criticism and comment?
08:25.2
Because that's what I do.
08:27.1
I criticize and I comment.
08:31.6
similar purposes is not
08:33.4
an infringement of copyright.
08:38.8
Tignan na lang natin yung mga importante,
08:40.8
mga kabatas natin.
08:41.6
In determining whether the use of
08:43.6
a work in any particular case
08:47.2
the factors to be considered,
08:49.7
the purpose and character of the use,
08:53.1
including whether such use
08:54.5
is of a commercial nature
08:56.7
or for non-profit education purposes.
09:01.6
Mga kabatas natin,
09:03.8
for non-profit education purposes.
09:06.9
The nature of the copyrighted work.
09:11.2
The amount and substantiality
09:13.9
of the portion used
09:15.8
in relation to the copyrighted work
09:19.2
the effect of the use
09:23.1
upon the potential market
09:28.1
of the copyrighted work.
09:32.0
the aforementioned elements of fair use
09:33.9
were discussed in the case of
09:35.8
Fisher v. Dees tweet.
09:39.5
Mga kabatas natin,
09:41.4
this Fisher v. Dees
09:43.6
is American jurisprudence.
09:50.5
Our fair use laws
09:51.9
and jurisprudence,
09:53.7
mga kabatas natin,
09:59.5
from U.S. jurisprudence.
10:05.6
mga kabatas natin,
10:08.0
the fair use doctrine
10:09.4
was initially developed
10:11.4
as an equitable defense
10:13.0
to copyright infringement.
10:18.2
creates a limited privilege
10:20.1
in those other than
10:21.2
the owner of a copyright
10:22.5
to use the copyrighted
10:25.1
in a reasonable manner
10:26.9
without the owner's consent.
10:29.8
mga kabatas natin.
10:33.0
copyrighted material
10:35.0
without the owner's consent
10:43.6
Okay, so meron dito naman
10:45.9
Hindi ko nababasahin yan,
10:47.0
mga kabatas natin.
10:48.2
Congress codified
10:49.4
this judge-made doctrine
10:51.8
of the Copyright Act
10:53.0
blah, blah, blah, blah.
10:54.1
This one, mga kabatas natin,
10:56.4
that's from the United States,
10:59.3
but that enactment
11:01.7
the fair use doctrine
11:05.0
Congress expressly sought
11:08.3
common law character,
11:14.5
to particular situations
11:18.2
on a case-by-case basis.
11:20.3
It's been a long-standing rule din,
11:24.4
mga kabatas natin,
11:28.0
it's case-by-case basis.
11:31.8
In restating the fair use doctrine
11:35.0
Congress enumerated
11:35.9
four non-exclusive factors
11:37.5
for courts to consider.
11:40.0
The purpose and character
11:43.1
including whether such use
11:44.9
is of a commercial nature
11:47.1
for non-exclusive factors.
11:48.2
The purpose and character
11:50.2
including whether such use
11:51.2
is of a commercial nature
11:52.2
or for non-exclusive factors.
11:53.2
The nature of the copyrighted work,
11:54.9
and substantiality
11:56.3
of the portion used
11:57.8
in relation to the copyrighted work
12:02.8
upon the potential market
12:04.2
of the copyrighted work.
12:08.1
Ngayon, mga kabatas natin,
12:10.3
the prosecution declared
12:12.9
that there is no fair use
12:14.1
as the purpose and character
12:15.9
is of a commercial nature
12:17.2
since the accusation
12:20.9
used in his YouTube channel.
12:23.2
This is not denied
12:30.6
C-annexes E-N-O-N-U
12:32.8
counter affidavit
12:33.8
and rejoinder affidavit.
12:36.0
ang hindi ko dininay dito,
12:40.1
mga kabatas natin,
12:48.2
hindi maganda yung basis nila
13:22.4
yung basihan kasi nila,
13:23.6
mga kabatas natin.
13:27.6
there is a commercial context.
13:30.3
Parang sinasabi kasi dito
13:32.1
mga kabatas natin,
13:34.0
sinasabi ng korte dito
13:38.3
commercial context.
13:40.7
At meron na rin naman,
13:42.2
mga kabatas natin,
13:43.6
ruling tungkol dyan.
13:50.7
except for money.
13:54.6
Luther R. Campbell
14:00.4
of the United States
14:02.2
had observed that
14:04.8
carried presumptive force
14:06.4
against a finding
14:10.9
of the illustrative uses
14:12.0
listed in the preamble,
14:14.4
including news reporting,
14:15.8
comment criticism,
14:18.3
since these activities
14:19.6
are generally conducted
14:20.6
for profit in this country.
14:24.1
Anong sinabi ng korte dito,
14:25.6
mga kabatas natin?
14:26.9
Sinayit nila yung
14:27.7
Luther R. Campbell
14:28.6
versus Ako Rose Music
14:33.7
commercial purpose.
14:35.2
Mga kabatas natin,
14:36.3
lumabas na rin kasi ito
14:38.1
H3H Reproductions,
14:42.0
sa commerciality.
14:56.2
merong commerciality
14:59.0
or there is profit,
15:00.9
mga kabatas natin,
15:06.2
mga kabatas natin,
15:07.4
kahit news reporting,
15:08.5
we all know that is
15:11.0
ad sila na nandodon eh.
15:12.8
Lahat ng comments,
15:13.8
lahat ng criticism,
15:15.0
lahat ng teaching,
15:15.9
lahat ng scholarship,
15:18.1
mga kabatas natin,
15:20.2
hindi na fair use.
15:22.9
Kung yun ang magiging
15:24.8
na kumikita ka kasi dyan.
15:37.0
ng Luther R. Campbell
15:42.6
Wala nang magiging
15:46.0
ang sinasabi mo lang,
15:47.0
ngayon pag kumikita
15:48.6
dun sa kanyang ginagawa,
15:51.1
Wala nang fair use.
15:56.0
mga kabatas natin,
16:01.1
New Line Cinema Corporation,
16:03.3
cautioned emphasizing
16:04.4
the commercial nature
16:07.5
in the following manner.
16:09.6
the Second Circuit
16:10.2
has recently explained
16:11.4
that courts should be wary
16:12.7
of placing too much
16:13.7
emphasis on whether
16:21.1
of commercial gain
16:24.8
hindi nagiging hypocrite
16:26.0
mga kabatas natin.
16:34.9
Sabi niya ganyan.
16:40.5
mga kabatas natin,
16:44.1
may commercial gain
16:47.0
Ngayon, mga kabatas natin,
16:51.6
rather in the case
16:53.6
the economic basis
16:58.6
had been declared
17:03.0
suppresses demand.
17:06.1
Copyright infringement
17:09.3
Grabe, ganda, no?
17:12.2
Thus, infringement occurs
17:21.0
or has reasonable potential
17:22.7
commercially valuable.
17:27.3
Sinusupplant niya
17:32.6
Ngayon, mga kabatas natin,
17:34.3
yun din ang tanong
17:39.1
sa Rafi Tulfo in action,
17:43.4
ng Rafi Tulfo in action
17:45.0
at saka ni Rafi Tulfo,
17:48.0
Rafi Tulfo in action?
17:49.4
It does not, of course.
17:51.3
Galit pa nga sa akin
17:52.2
yung mga Tulfonatics.
17:53.8
the Tulfonatics are not
18:06.9
The commercial context
18:13.5
the videos of RTIA
18:14.8
in the target market.
18:17.0
akin to the fourth element
18:27.4
Does it supplant?
18:41.1
alam na natin eh.
18:45.9
Oo, sabi ni Sendong,
18:53.7
maliit audience natin
18:54.6
if you really want
18:55.9
be like Vince World.
18:59.9
Yun nga ang sinasabi nila
19:01.1
for the views ka,
19:02.5
If I'm for the views
19:03.5
or for the money,
19:10.7
Attorney Villamor.
19:20.2
kay Attorney Villamor.
19:23.4
ishishill ko lang
19:27.1
Gagamitin ko yung
19:28.5
mga walang kwenta
19:33.2
will not watch me?
19:36.6
I think they will watch me,
19:38.2
especially the Tulfonatics.
19:46.1
baka mga mas malaki kita,
19:48.3
atikihin ko si Atty. L.
19:49.7
May KTV perks pa.
19:51.9
hindi ka lang kikita
19:57.0
May payroll ka pa.
20:07.2
May payroll ka pa.
20:09.2
You have all the perks there.
20:13.1
the most important perk
20:14.6
is may backer ka.
20:15.8
Na isang politician.
20:25.1
O, hindi mo na kailangan
20:26.3
buksan yung abulo yan.
20:32.0
mag-slander na mga tao.
20:33.5
Gumawa ng hindi tama.
20:49.6
clear naman kasi yun eh.
20:54.5
Free shoutout pa sa
20:55.5
Rafi Tools for Inaction.
21:02.7
May backer perks,
21:09.7
there is no supplanting
21:10.9
of the RTI videos
21:14.2
in the target market
21:16.3
of the Rafi Tools for
21:19.5
Rafi Tools was even
21:20.6
elected a senator
21:30.8
nalo pa nga siya eh.
21:36.4
Kasama pa sa birthday
21:41.5
All throughout the period
21:45.6
in these 32 cases
21:46.7
and up to the present,
21:49.8
of Rafi Tools for Inaction
21:51.3
did not diminish.
21:55.5
was gaining profit
21:56.3
on the RTIA videos
21:59.4
because the latter
22:01.6
of being supplanted
22:07.9
Napakasimple lang
22:08.7
mga kabatas natin.
22:15.0
critics of Rafi Tulfo
22:30.7
It cannot be used
22:33.5
Magkaibang magkaiba.
22:44.1
than the legal services
22:44.7
offered by the accused.
22:48.1
yung services na inooffer nila
22:54.5
I'm teaching law.
23:00.3
They sensationalize things.
23:03.4
yung mga pamilya.
23:04.6
Yun yung ginagawa nila nun.
23:14.7
or viable indicator
23:19.2
of the copyrighted work.
23:23.1
The copyrighted works
23:24.8
are audiovisual representations
23:28.0
public service program
23:35.2
Ito kasi mga kabatas natin,
23:37.2
dito rin kasi tinitignan
23:38.3
yung transformation.
23:41.4
Many times we discussed
23:42.8
about transformation.
23:44.7
Kapag ikaw ay gagawa
23:50.5
is within fair use,
23:53.7
the work should be transformed.
23:56.0
How is it more transformative
24:00.5
what is Rafi Tulfo doing?
24:11.9
Because look at the
24:13.5
how opposite it is.
24:16.2
versus due process.
24:19.3
Ayaw sa justice system
24:20.8
versus Tulfo brand of justice.
24:27.9
Gusto sa justice system
24:29.4
versus Tulfo brand of justice.
24:37.5
Ang sabi ni Kayo,
24:39.5
hearing the other side
24:47.6
The assailed videos
24:48.8
are the criticisms
24:51.6
on the said videos
24:54.8
designated as fair use
24:56.2
because the original work
25:02.0
as to transform it
25:13.9
of the U.S. Supreme Court
25:15.2
in the case of Andy Warhol Foundation
25:17.5
for the Visual Art Incorporated
25:19.6
versus Goldsmith et al.
25:22.9
Tulad na sinabi ko sa inyo,
25:24.9
this is a treasure trove
25:29.0
in relation to copyright
25:31.3
infringement and fair use.
25:43.3
ang dami ko rin natutunan dito.
25:53.0
Consider the purposes
25:54.0
listed in the preamble
25:55.5
paragraph of 107.
26:03.4
Although the examples
26:06.2
and not limitative,
26:09.5
the sorts of copying
26:12.0
most commonly have found
26:18.3
the first factor inquiry.
26:21.2
As the Court of Appeals observed,
26:23.1
the examples are easily understood
26:24.8
as they contemplate
26:26.1
the use of an original work
26:27.5
to serve a manifestly different purpose
26:30.3
from the work itself.
26:32.6
Criticism of a work,
26:34.9
ordinarily does not supersede
26:38.0
or supplant the work.
26:45.0
Nakikita niyo yun?
26:46.4
Mga kapatid natin?
26:48.1
Criticism of a work,
26:49.9
ordinarily does not
26:51.0
supersede the objects of
26:52.5
or supplant the work.
26:56.3
to serve a distinct end.
26:59.9
Well, in this case,
27:03.8
ng Rafi Tulfo in Action
27:10.8
Ano yung end na yon?
27:11.8
Ano yung dulo na yon?
27:12.9
Mga kapatid natin,
27:20.5
sa justice system,
27:26.7
the administrative
27:45.7
criticism of a copyrighted work
28:02.8
Mga kapatid natin,
28:20.8
pag nakakakita ka
28:23.1
mga kapatid natin,
28:51.2
yung decision na yan.
28:56.7
Hindi lang wisdom,
29:17.4
mga kapatid natin,
29:18.2
whatever happens here,
29:21.5
magpagsisertuary daw sila,
29:23.1
blah, blah, blah, blah.
29:25.9
pagpaggaling kayo
29:27.3
wag na lang kayong
29:30.4
Kasi yung sinasabi niya
29:31.2
na Supreme Court,
29:34.1
didiretso ba talaga
29:35.1
sila sa Supreme Court?
29:41.2
sinungaling naman,
29:46.3
mga kapatid natin,
29:50.1
this is the first
30:03.3
trove of knowledge.
30:08.2
mga kapatid natin,
30:11.5
for everyone's reference.
30:23.9
for everyone's reference,
30:25.6
mga kapatid natin.
30:27.0
Yung mga citations na yan,
30:29.5
mga kapatid natin,
30:30.9
I've been in practice
30:32.3
for a very long time.
30:35.1
I don't even know those.
30:40.8
I don't even know those.
30:44.7
mga kapatid natin,
30:52.6
A person of power
31:04.3
Rafi Tulfo is in need
31:05.7
of people who can
31:07.8
especially as the
31:09.6
following adagio,
31:10.8
adage to be true.
31:15.3
Faithful are the wounds
31:18.8
Profuse are the kisses
31:22.0
So look, Rafi Tulfo,
31:23.4
it seems I'm your friend.
31:30.9
Lipat tayo sa kabila,
31:34.3
mga kapatid natin.
31:36.5
Mahaba-haba pa ito.
31:41.6
Maraming salamat sa inyo.
31:43.4
tulad na lang yung sinasabi.
31:44.7
Matulog po tayo ng mahimbing
31:46.5
na yung natutulog ng mahimbing,
31:48.0
siya yung laging panalo.
